Skip to main content

Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement

Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement 

1. The term ‘wrongful restraint’ denotes a wilful obstruction of an individual to keep that individual from proceeding toward any path in which that individual has a privilege to continue. 
 
lawyer in rajgurunagar
Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement
2. According to section 339 of the Indian Penal Code, “Whoever voluntarily obstructs any person to prevent that person from proceeding in any direction in which that person has a right to proceed is said wrongfully to restrain that person”. 

3. There are certain exceptions to this definition. The obstruction of a private way over land or water in which a person in good faith believes him to have a lawful right to obstruct is not an offense within the meaning of this section. 

4. Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code defines punishment for wrongful restraint. It states that whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both. This offense is bailable and cognizable. 

5. The term “wrongful confinement” has been explained under section 340 of the Indian Penal Code, which lays down that whoever wrongfully restrains any person in such a manner as to prevent that person from proceeding beyond certain circumscribing limits said “wrongfully to confine” that person. 

6. Punishment for wrongful confinement is explained under sections 342-348 of the Indian Penal Code. Section 342 states that whoever wrongfully confines any person shall be punished with imprisonment extending to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. This is a cognizable and bailable offense. 

7. Section 343 of the Indian Penal Code defines the punishment of wrongful confinement for three or more days. It states that whoever confines any person for three days, or more, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term extending to two years, or with fine, or with both. 

8. Section 344 defines punishment of wrongful confinement for ten or more days. It specifies that whoever wrongfully confines any person for ten days or more shall be punished with imprisonment extending to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. 

9. Section 345 defines punishment for wrongful confinement of a person for whose liberation writ has been issued. It states that whoever keeps any person in wrongful confinement, knowing that a writ for the liberation of that person has been duly issued, shall be punished with imprisonment extending to two years besides any term of imprisonment to which he may be liable under any other section of this chapter. This offense is cognizable, bailable and non-compoundable. 

10. Section 346 of the Indian Penal Code defines punishment for wrongful confinement in secret. It states that whoever wrongfully confines any person in such a manner as to show an intention that the confinement of such a person may not be known to any person interested in the person so confines, or to any public servant, or that the place of such confinement may not be known to or discovered by any such person or public servant as herein-before mentioned shall be punished with imprisonment extending to two years besides any other punishment to which he may be liable for such wrongful confinement. 

11. Section 347 defines punishment for wrongful confinement to extort property or constraint to an illegal act. It states that whoever wrongfully confines any person to extort from the person confined, or from any person interested in the person confined, any property or valuable security or of constraining the person confined or any person interested in such person to do anything illegal or to give any information which may facilitate the commission of an offense shall be punished with imprisonment extending to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. 

12. Section 348 defines punishment for wrongful confinement to extort confession or compel restoration of the property. It states that whoever wrongfully confines any person for extorting from the person confined or any person interested in the person confined any confession or any information which may lead to the detection of an offense or misconduct, or to constrain the person confined or any person interested in the person confined to restore or to cause the restoration of any property or valuable security or to satisfy any claim or demand, or to give information which may lead to the restoration of any property or valuable security shall be punished with imprisonment extending to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. 


These articles are written for educational purpose only, this is not for any kind of advertisement of the writer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Negotiable Instruments Act 2018 Amendment pdf Gazette Notification: Top 12 Points

1.  With the help of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act 2018, new provisions related to interim compensation are added in the Negotiable instruments Act 1881. 
2.  It adds two new sections to the NIA 1881; Section 143A and Section 148 to limit the issues of dishonor of cheque and to stop the injustice that a cheque bearer faces after the dishonor of the cheque. 
3.   In the cases of dishonor of cheques the drawer drags the case longer to avoid the payment and before this amendment, the cheque holder was not entitled to any kind of compensation until the Court fully resolved the case. The Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act 2018 focuses on this unfair issue faced by the cheque holder. 
4.  The newly added Section 143A gives power to the trial court to allow interim compensation to the complainant of dishonor of cheques when the accused pleads not guilty. 
5.  Section 143A specifies that the interim compensation provided shall not exceed twenty percent of the amount of the cheque…

Legal Heir Certificate Format I download pdf copy

Legal Heir Certificate Format

1. According to the Bombay Regulation Act when a member of a family dies then the next Legal heir can apple for the Legal heir Certificate.
2. This certificate is generally required for the legitimate heirs of the person who passed away and can be used by lawful heirs for pension claims, provident fund claims, insurance claims, gratuity, retirement benefits, service advantages, etc.
3. A legal heir certificate cannot be used in the matter of property transfer where a person dies without a valid will and also cases related to money establishments. In these cases, we require a succession certificate. We mostly use the Succession Certificate for inheriting the property left behind by the dead person for his heir.


Procedure for getting legal heir certificate

4. Only the legal heirs of the dead person are eligible to apply for a legal heir certificate. Legal heir includes Husband/Wife or Son/Daughter or mother of the deceased person.
5. The Legal Heir Certifica…

Top 10 Points On A Couple Can File For Divorce In Court (2020)

1. Mental disease – intellectual sickness can become a ground for filing a divorce if the spouse of the petitioner suffers from incurable mental disorder or insanity and therefore can't be expected from the couple to stay collectively.
2. Desertion – wherein one of the spouses voluntarily abandons his/her associate for at least a duration of two years, the abandoned partner can file a divorce case at the ground of desertion.
3. Not heard alive – if a person isn't seen or heard alive through those who are predicted to be ‘clearly heard’ of the person for a non-stop duration of seven years, the person is presumed to be useless. the opposite spouse needs to need to report a divorce ifHe/she is inquisitive about remarriage.
4. Venereal sickness – if one of the spouses is stricken by a critical sickness this is without problems communicable, a divorce can be filed by the other partner. the sexually transmitted illnesses like aids are accounted to be venereal diseases.
5. Renunciation –…